 |
The Implosion of Emergency Services in the
Texas Gulf Coast
By Guy L. Clifton, M.D.
Neurosurgeon and Clinical Investigator,
UT-Houston Medical School
The term "Golden Hour" is used by trauma surgeons to
indicate that prompt care of seriously injured patients
saves one-third to one-half from unnecessary death.
Eighty percent of trauma is from motor vehicles and
over half is alcohol-related with only seven percent
from gunshot wounds. Texas has 21 major trauma centers
(Level I or II) located in most of its major cities.
(The only difference in Level I and II is that research
is done in Level I centers.) These centers always have
trauma surgeons in the hospital, specialists 15 minutes
away, and operating rooms and radiology facilities ready
for service 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Intensive
care units are equipped and staffed to care for the
most seriously ill patients. The Level I and II centers
in each region of the state are backed up by Level III
centers that have the capability to care for injuries
that are not immediately life threatening. The trauma
care system in Texas has consistently been able to provide
rapid, specialized, life-saving care to anyone needing
it at any time until recently. The stories of its failure
are sobering.
Delmar Clyde was an active 72-year-old man who had retired
to McAllen, Texas after a career in the computer industry.
He began to lose consciousness on the morning of January
10, 2001. His wife called an ambulance, and he was taken
to McAllen Regional Hospital where a CT scan showed
a subdural hematoma, a blood clot between his skull
and brain. Such a condition is an extreme emergency.
Immediate surgery to remove the blood clot can be life
saving. Because the McAllen hospital did not have the
capability to perform such a surgery, doctors in the
McAllen emergency room sought immediate transfer to
a hospital with capability to care for Mr. Clyde. Doctors
at the McAllen hospital however, called nine hospitals
in the region but found none with an empty intensive
care bed. As they call hospitals further and further
away from McAllen, one empty intensive bed was found
at Ben Taub Hospital in Houston. In desperation, the
patient was flown approximately 300 miles from McAllen
to Houston where he underwent surgery immediately upon
arrival - twelve hours after he lost consciousness.
By the time Mr. Clyde had surgery the clot had damaged
his brain beyond recovery.
Unfortunately, this is not an isolated instance. A car
struck a 21-year-old Katy, Texas man on Halloween night
of 2001. He was immediately unconscious and was taken
from the scene by ambulance to a small Katy hospital
where he was found to have a severe brain injury, broken
legs and injury to his chest. Normally patients with
severe injuries are admitted to a local trauma center
within one hour of injury. However, when Katy hospital
personnel called both of Houston's Level I trauma centers,
Memorial Hermann and Ben Taub Hospital, all intensive
care beds were full. The young man was flown to the
trauma center at Brackenridge Hospital in Austin, arriving
more than three hours after injury, where he subsequently
died.
In the winter of 2001 in Montgomery County, a car driven
by a young mother swerved to avoid a head-on collision
at night. The car struck a large pole. The mother and
her two children, four and ten years old, were taken
to Conroe Medical Center. The mother died of her injuries
in the emergency room. The two children sustained brain
injuries and fractures, requiring specialized care immediately
- care not available in Conroe. After six hours of phone
calls, two pediatric intensive care beds were found
at the trauma center in Galveston. There were none in
Houston. Fortunately, these two children recovered,
but had their injuries been more severe, the delay could
have been fatal.
The delay was fatal for two patients who sustained severe
injuries and were taken to Cleveland Regional Medical
Center in January. After six hours of attempts to find
a Level I trauma center with an empty intensive care
bed, both patients died in the emergency department
of this small hospital. The nurse in attendance said,
"I just had the feeling that the 18-year-old could have
been saved."
Divert status is a signal sent out by hospitals when
their emergency room is full or their hospital beds
are full. Beginning in 1999, both Ben Taub and Memorial
Hermann Hospitals experienced periods of insufficient
capacity for patients who needed Level I care. The two
most common reasons for divert status are no more beds
in the emergency room in which to put a patient (one-quarter
of divert signals), and full intensive care beds (three-quarters
of the time). When both major trauma centers in Houston
are on divert, City of Houston ambulances bring trauma
patients to both, and the hospitals simply do their
best to make room. In this circumstance, the trauma
centers act as the hospital nearest the injury. However,
trauma patients outside the city limits taken from the
scene of injury to the emergency rooms of small hospitals
to be stabilized must be delayed in admission when there
is not room in the trauma centers. The consequences
of divert status by the trauma centers have been quantified.
Dr. Charles Begley of the University of Texas School
of Public Health has shown that on days when Houston's
two major trauma centers are on divert status for 8
hours or longer, the mortality rate of patients needing
transfer is doubled. In 2001, Ben Taub Hospital and
Memorial Hermann Hospital were on divert for at least
8 hours one-third of all days.
Save Our ER's was an organization founded to remedy
these problems. A recent study in this region conducted
by the Abaris Group and sponsored by Save Our ER's has
shown that every hospital outside Houston has reported
patients routinely endangered by delays in transfer.
Not only trauma patients but also children with any
emergency condition and patients with neurological emergencies
were endangered due to transfer delays. Texas Department
of Health standards call for transfer of emergency patients
who need a higher level of care from small hospitals
to larger hospitals within 2 hours of admission to the
first hospital. In our region 70% of patients are transferred
in over 3 hours with 10% requiring over 6 hours to transfer.
Rural ambulance services throughout the region are failing
due to lack of finances. Even if a bed can be found,
in 14% of cases an ambulance may not be available for
transport. Complicating the root cause of ICU bed and
ambulance shortages was the finding that two-thirds
of patients in our areas emergency rooms had complaints
that were not urgent. Medicaid and uninsured patients
flood our region's emergency rooms because they have
no place else to go for care. The picture that emerges
is of periodic failure of the emergency services system
to provide appropriate care in the Texas Gulf Coast.
The causes of this implosion are uncomplicated. Significant
reductions to hospitals in disproportionate share funds
(Federal monies to hospitals that care for a disproportionate
share of Medicaid and uninsured patient), the high percentage
of Texas children who are uninsured, historically low
hospital profit margins from care of Medicare and insured
patients, and the high percentage of working adults
between 18-64 years in Texas who are uninsured result
in significant losses to trauma centers. These centers
must take care of any injured patient at any time. When
an emergency patient is admitted no one knows who is
insured and who is not. The trauma centers, therefore,
admit the same percentage of the uninsured (or more)
present in the community. The uninsured problem is compounded
by an unexpected increase in demand for intensive care
services for all causes nationally and locally that
have outstripped hospital bed capacity. That is, patients
with other emergency medical problems are placing increased
demands on available ICU beds in trauma centers as well
as other hospitals.
A recent financial study by Bishop and Associates which
was sponsored by Save Our ERs showed that the region's
three Level I trauma centers (Memorial Hermann, Ben
Taub and the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston)
and its 8 Level III hospitals provided $39 million in
care to uninsured trauma patients in 2000. The average
loss on care of every trauma patient was over $2500
per admitted patient with losses on some patients exceeding
$200,000. For this reason no new ICU beds for care of
trauma patients have been added in the region for 10
years despite a 20% increase in population. Expansion
of ICU beds or creation of new Level I and II trauma
centers is impossible as long as hospitals lose more
money for every trauma ICU bed they open and every trauma
patient they admit.
Two steps must be taken to protect public health. First,
sources of funding to permit hospitals to expand trauma
services have to be found. Hospitals, doctors, and rehabilitation
facilities in this region are providing $60 million/year
in care to uninsured trauma patients with no reimbursement.
Certainly, they cannot expand capacity without reimbursement.
Second, a regional entity should be empowered to dispense
the funds and coordinate the delivery of emergency services
in the 13 counties of the region. A regional entity
is necessary to ensure that trauma capacity is increased
and meets community needs. A regional entity is needed
to finance and monitor availability of ambulance services
in rural counties where the voluntary system is imploding.
The problem is not just with trauma care. Pediatric
ICU capacity is deficient now. Hospitals are losing
money from care of Medicare patients admitted to ICU
beds. Elderly patients needing intensive care could
face the same shortages that trauma and pediatric patients
face now. In Houston, we woke up one morning and had
lost 15 percent of the city's already insufficient trauma
capacity as Ben Taub Hospital ran out of money and nurses
to keep trauma beds open. This might have been prevented
with ongoing monitoring of the situation by a regional
entity that had the financial power to affect behaviors
of hospitals and emergency medical service systems.
The lack of regional emergency services infrastructure
would leave us entirely unable to cope with a catastrophe
such as 9/11.
The Houston/Galveston Area Council is composed of elected
officials of Harris and every surrounding county and
most municipalities. This established entity deals with
issues requiring regional solutions such as transportation
and air quality. It receives and distributes both State
and Federal funds to regional governments. It has not,
in the past, had a significant role in health care.
This is the logical entity to solve the regional emergency
services crisis. Both Harris County Commissioner's Court
and the Board of the Houston/Galveston Area Council
have supported the creation of an Emergency Services
Council through the Houston/Galveston Area Council.
This Council would accomplish the objective of ensuring
that every patient needing emergency services in the
region receives care in a timely manner.
These steps will be an appropriate start to solving
our regional crisis. It will be up to the community
to work together to find solutions for this public safety
crisis.
|
 |